Red Dead Redemption on Switch: an impressive, creditable port
Red Dead Redemption on Switch: an impressive, creditable port
by theitguyforever
6 Comments
MaidKnightAmber
It’s not impressive at all. It’s just a straight port of a 360 and PS3 title. The Switch is stronger than both consoles. There was no way RDR was going to fail to work on the Switch unless the dev team was just completely incompetent.
twili-midna
If only it wasn’t $50.
PuzzlePottage
It’s impressive in concept alone. As pleasing as it is to see franchises such as *Red Dead Redemption* becoming available to audiences who likely had no previous method of experiencing them, the price of such a basic port is rather disconcerting. And Rockstar Games are incapable of justifying it with the Switch’s portability gimmick as they are charging the exact same for the PS4 version.
I adore the *Red Dead Redemption* series, and I think it completely understandable for anyone without access to older hardware to want to purchase this new port, but this entire debacle reeks of corporate greed.
6 Comments
It’s not impressive at all. It’s just a straight port of a 360 and PS3 title. The Switch is stronger than both consoles. There was no way RDR was going to fail to work on the Switch unless the dev team was just completely incompetent.
If only it wasn’t $50.
It’s impressive in concept alone. As pleasing as it is to see franchises such as *Red Dead Redemption* becoming available to audiences who likely had no previous method of experiencing them, the price of such a basic port is rather disconcerting. And Rockstar Games are incapable of justifying it with the Switch’s portability gimmick as they are charging the exact same for the PS4 version.
I adore the *Red Dead Redemption* series, and I think it completely understandable for anyone without access to older hardware to want to purchase this new port, but this entire debacle reeks of corporate greed.
*Hate click baiting btw.
Got my digital copy
Neato. That price still sucks.