Nintendo

Playstation portal $199, 8 inch lcd 1080p 60fps. Can nintendo offer a similar specs with its new hardware?



Playstation portal $199, 8 inch lcd 1080p 60fps. Can nintendo offer a similar specs with its new hardware?

by toomuchredditmaj

19 Comments

  1. aim_not_good

    Am I the only one who believes $200 is excessive?

  2. vsantamaria

    It costs $200, has no native games, and is unappealing.

    …Why?

    Sony, why is this even a thing? *What industry does it cater to?What does it achieve that a straightforward new PSP *wouldn’t*?

    Please say no! I would adore to know.

  3. Mandabuns

    The phrase “Sony releases new useless piece of shit that doesn’t fucking work” brings to mind the famous Onion video.

  4. Slimnatie

    Why couldn’t this device stream PS Plus games and your PS5 to any location where you had a strong WiFi connection? Such a wasted chance.

  5. sponge_bucket

    “Sony to release device to compete with smartphone function they invented in 2014” ftfy

  6. Riomegon

    By similar specs… do you mean a hollow husk with no internals to actually run any games?

    Sure Nintendo can do that… but why would they?

  7. Dreyfus2006

    They already beat this thing in 2012 with the Wii U. Less range but better games.

  8. fridawasfound

    I thought the design was absurd; they essentially cut a PS5 controller in half.

  9. ventaqussy

    Is even remote play trustworthy? I thought it needed a flawless Internet connection to function properly.

  10. Miaonope

    The “Remote Play Dedicated Device”

    Essentially, then, a Wii U pad? Gosh, lol

  11. selesiia

    It was $50 less expensive than I had anticipated.

  12. Keep in mind, it isn’t like the Switch, it is like a Wii U GamePad

  13. TheDoctorDB

    Wow… I tried the Backbone thing cuz I got it for a decent price but hated how it was situated with the iPhone 14 Pro. The “adapter” was bogus and the whole thing felt like it wasn’t worth it. But I had a grand few minutes of playing Star Wars on my phone.

    So when this was announced pretty much immediately after I returned the Backbone, I was actually intrigued. It’s not like the Switch, though. A dedicated streaming device for PS Remote Play is essentially just a convenience feature. For the $80 I initially paid for Backbone, it was a cool idea. For the full $100 it’s a bit worse.

    …For $200 I’m blown away with disappointment. Would the system still need to be on the whole time? And regular streaming with PS+ Premium isn’t supported? What were they thinking? Could have a brand new Switch Lite for the same price.

    So the question is a bit backwards. This was supposed to be competing with the idea of portable console gaming introduced by the Switch. And it looks like Sony is failing to deliver. All this accomplishes is bringing your controller into the next room and charging you $200 for it while restricting what you can stream.

  14. WorldlyDear

    I honestly think the switch is superior because it doesn’t require internet to function

  15. djwillis1121

    You obviously have no idea what this even is. It doesn’t play games locally. It’s basically just a Wii U GamePad

  16. MonochromeTyrant

    Nintendo can safely ignore this thing, as it’s not offering anything they aren’t or even competing with the Switch, as has been pointed out repeatedly.

Write A Comment