Hoyoverse’s Honkai: Nexus Anima “infringes” Nintendo mount patent from Palworld lawsuit, IP consultant says
Hoyoverse’s Honkai: Nexus Anima “infringes” Nintendo mount patent from Palworld lawsuit, IP consultant says
by Sam_27142317
7 Comments
AutoModerator
This submission involves a controversial topic. Please remember to follow **Rule 1** and **Rule 5**.
* Avoid console wars and flamebaiting. Do not get into spats about which console or game is best or worst. Do not accuse other users of blind fanboyism. Avoid using terms like “bootlicker”, or “shill”.
* Do not link to, promote, or request illegal content.
Failure to follow these rules may result in comment removals or bans.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nintendo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[deleted]
[deleted]
Dukemon102
Also the Monster Hunter Stories games and the upcoming Digimon Story: Time Stranger have rideable creatures. Honkai is being used as an example of how overreaching the mount patent claim is, so it shouldn’t be a patent at all if it is a feature so basic.
In this case I think I agree with the lawyer.
NekoBerry420
>It’s important to note that this does not mean Nintendo will take legal action against Hoyoverse, and the outcome of their litigation with Pocketpair still remains to be seen.
Kind of click baity
Chaos_-7
Nintendo won’t care if the game is available on the Switch, also don’t have the guts to go after Hoyo if it wasn’t available.
Golden-Owl
Nintendo only cared about Palworld because it got very closely tied to Sony
Since Hoyo is more concerned with mobile games and doesn’t overlap with Pokemon’s target audience, Nintendo realistically shouldn’t care, unless it impacts their existing Palworld case
iWantToLickEly
Fuck Nintendo (or any company for that matter) trying to patent gameplay mechanics.
7 Comments
This submission involves a controversial topic. Please remember to follow **Rule 1** and **Rule 5**.
* Avoid console wars and flamebaiting. Do not get into spats about which console or game is best or worst. Do not accuse other users of blind fanboyism. Avoid using terms like “bootlicker”, or “shill”.
* Do not link to, promote, or request illegal content.
Failure to follow these rules may result in comment removals or bans.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nintendo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[deleted]
Also the Monster Hunter Stories games and the upcoming Digimon Story: Time Stranger have rideable creatures. Honkai is being used as an example of how overreaching the mount patent claim is, so it shouldn’t be a patent at all if it is a feature so basic.
In this case I think I agree with the lawyer.
>It’s important to note that this does not mean Nintendo will take legal action against Hoyoverse, and the outcome of their litigation with Pocketpair still remains to be seen.
Kind of click baity
Nintendo won’t care if the game is available on the Switch, also don’t have the guts to go after Hoyo if it wasn’t available.
Nintendo only cared about Palworld because it got very closely tied to Sony
Since Hoyo is more concerned with mobile games and doesn’t overlap with Pokemon’s target audience, Nintendo realistically shouldn’t care, unless it impacts their existing Palworld case
Fuck Nintendo (or any company for that matter) trying to patent gameplay mechanics.